Yes, but then you are attacking this guys science. Which is what it is all about.
I am not backing the facts. I am fascinated that he is pursuing it at all. And that he may have found a logical explanation to an incredible miracle. It makes me then wonder, could it maybe NOT have been a miracle? Did Jesus claim it was? Did observers just get it wrong? Was there some kind of "telephone" mutation of the story? Was it a David Blaine-like misdirection? On 4/6/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I would have to disagree. This is EXACTLY what science does. > > > > It takes an observed event (we will leave aside the credibility of the > > event) and tries to find an explanation. It then tries to predict > > future behaviors and repeat it. > > > > Well, you make a pretty good point. I guess science can posit some possible > explanations based upon whatever corporeal evidence they are able to > present. > > I've re-read the actual passages from the Bible that talk about this > particular miracle though, and an ice theory wouldn't really explain the > events as written....so I just can't shake this sneaking suspicion that > science is barking up a tree that it can't possibly climb. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203170 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
