And that's why I can' stand either party. Time to clean house.
-- Timothy Heald Analyst, Architect, Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: 202-228-8372 C: 703-300-3911 -----Original Message----- From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 5:20 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Libby said Bush approved the leak? If Libby's version is the truth, there is certainly an argument to be made that it was unethical, but as Sam pointed out, everything Joe Wilson did proceeded from an unethical act- failing to disclose his wife's connection to his trip. His assertion, of course, is that she was a secret agent and he could not disclose the connection without exposing her. In and of itself, I believe his use of the law as a defense for disclosing his conflict of interest is unethical. And that's what makes this case so interesting- it shows how the world of politics and media really work. On 4/6/06, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At the very least though, isn't this unethical? > > On 4/6/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The other side of the argument (at least Libby's lawyer's side) is > > that > the > > leak was justified because it revealed a conflict of interest in the > > decision to send Joe Wilson to Nigeria, i.e. his wife's > > recommendation > that > > he go- countering the notion that Wilson was an inside guy with the > > administration instead of a crony. So it had little to do with > > vindictiveness and a lot to do with spin control. > > -- --------------- Robert Munn www.funkymojo.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203229 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
