As I said before, I agree with that. It is misleading and unethical.

But to claim the lied about the entire thing is going a little too far. We
know we have to read every line of everything these people say and do.
Simply relying on some reporter to tell us everything isn't going to work.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> The problem is that this administration is caught again and again with
> lies of omission.  They cherry pick information to share, leak,
> whatever, that is only part of the picture - the part they want you to
> see.  And they make policy from it.
> 
> That's unethical.
> 
> In the WMD case, only omit evidence to support an unsupportable case,
> they went so far as to use the same technique to discredit opponents
> of their flawed message.
> 
> That's called propaganda and has no place in a democracy.
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203632
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to