I just re-read the Washington Post article. It says something completely 
different. Either you are simply chosing not to believe it or I am missing 
something, which has been known to happen. Care to explain?

>The only stuff that was false that they declassified were a couple of
>the forged docs. The meetings and the intent to purchase was still
>factual.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 7:15 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: whew! it's all ok, cause they were lying anyway
>
>yes, and they knew this when they were "declssifying" it to "explain."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203780
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to