Sure it is. That compiled with other reasons. They were still under sanction from the UN preventing them from doing exactly what he did. Those 16 words in the State of the Union spoke of this meeting.
Once Saddam had a nuclear weapon invasion would have been moved off the table. He would have attempted to use the nuke on any invading force, or Israel, even if it meant killing hundreds of thousands in Iraq. There are people we cannot allow to have nukes. They will not use them as a defensive measure, but as a first strike offensive measure. Saddam could not be allowed to acquire anything to build a nuclear weapon. Invasion before such thing would be the only way to deal with it. > -----Original Message----- > From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:28 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: whew! it's all ok, cause they were lying anyway > > That still was not a reason to invade. the only reason to invade is if > Saddam had stockpiles of chemical and nuclear weapons which he > intended to use. > > That was not so. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203709 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
