On 4/12/06, William Bowen wrote: > First, Clinton didn't lose the popular vote and take the presidency > after a hotly contested vote recount in a state whose Governor was his > brother, could not account for serious and egregious voting > irregularities and has to this this day never managed to explain why > entire regions of minority voters were turned away from what should > have been their polling places.
All the liberal papers that endorsed Gore conducted a recount and confirmed Bush won. Since the Dems usually control minority areas who would be responsible for turning people away? All the areas with disputed votes were controlled by the Dems so who's fault is it. > Further, when Clinton was re-elected the election didn't hinge on a > state where voting machines were purchased from a company whose CEO > publically stated that he would "do everything in his power" to keep > Bush in office. Again who decided to buy the machines? How about cigarettes for votes or all the dead people that voted? Cherry picking info is easy isn't it? > So yeah, I guess the elections worked properly after all... > > > -- > will > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203946 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
