> Autocratic Sam wrote: > One day later, the Central Intelligence Agency and Defense > Intelligence Agency publicly issued an assessment saying the opposite
Ah, Sammy, does your blind trust of government ever waver? No. Let's summarize this: 1.) Scientists who actually looked at the trailers say they have nothing to do with WMD. 2.) CIA analysts in Washinton say they do. Which does the President pick to tell America? #2, the shit. So your link is actually more proof that this administration cherry picked intelligence to bolster a bogus contention and war. Oh! And did you hear? A 5th Pentagon general has broke the decades long tradition and called this adminstration "arrogant" and said they cherry picked intelligence: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A fifth retired general, Major Gen. John Riggs, added his voice to those opposing Rumsfeld. In an interview with National Public Radio, Riggs cited an atmosphere of "arrogance" among top civilian leaders at the Pentagon. Of the Pentagon's civilian leadership, Riggs said: "They only need the military advice when it satisfies their agenda. I think that's a mistake, and that's why I think he should resign." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/13/AR2006041300995.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:204180 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
