> Dana wrote:
> I think that what you are persistently missing is that human capital is in 
> fact capital. You can refuse to maintain it, sure... but it's a bit 
> small-minded.

I totally agree.  Where we differ is the big picture.  For me the
gov't should provide the tools and education that any citizen needs to
make informed career, financial, and personal decisions.  After all,
that's what k-12 should be for.

I say "should be" because it isn't today.  The role I just layed out
has historically been done at the kitchen table (I think).  Dad would
tell his kids how the world worked, what the risks were, and how to
maximize their strengths while minimizing their weaknesses.  At least
in theory.  And if that failed, any HS kid could go work for the local
plant and make a middle class income.

That's all changed and the world has become much more complicated.
Competition has moved from local town, to city, to state, to region,
to country, to the world.  That means education in competition is at
the "do or die" point.  We, as a country, will either equip our kids
to compete globally or they'll lose.

Bill Clinton understands this - he once famously said something to the
effect of, "if [a policy] supports globalization, support it.  If it
doesn't, oppose it."

A policy that subsidizes mistakes doesn't support globalization, and
so I oppose it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:207271
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to