We are discussing quality of source. Hollywood isn't a quality source of political information (in general). Of course, a fictional book isn't a good source of religious doctrine either, but some people are having a hard time with that one too.
-Cameron On 5/24/06, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We weren't discussing the value of their opinion, just their right to > express it. It hasn't been that long since a former actor was elected > President of the United States, so obviously being an entertainer > doesn't preclude the public from putting value on your words. > > On 5/24/06, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't oppose their right to say something. I oppose the fact that I > > (or anyone) should place value on any out of touch bubble-boy movie > > star or musician's political viewpoints. > > > > I support free speech, and as much as I despise Clearchannel, I also > > support private industry's right to make their own business decisions. > > > > -Cameron > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:207577 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
