On 5/31/06, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No..the blind faith people actually account for vast swathes of central
> America.
> Take a look at the voting maps from the last elections.


No, blind faith people DONT actually account for vast swaths of central
america. How do i know? Gee...maybe because i live here.

Large swaths of central US states voted red, because they've always tended
to hold conservative values. This makes them a majority of blind faith
people? Frankly, that's insulting...and typical of this elitist bullshit
vibe I'm getting from the left.

To be clear: We have a disproportionately large percentage of people in this
area who really are blind-faith ultra-religious idiots....but no way do they
even approach a majority. They are instead an unfortunately powerful and
vocal minority.

Democrat votes were primarily along the eastern and western seaboards
> of the US, Bush support was down the middle. The religious south, and
> central states, the conservatives etc. is where Bush's support
> was.That's how they won.


Yes, I know. News flash: some people who voted for Bush probably aren't
"blind faith idiots". In fact, isn't that represented by the recent poll
numbers showing a large number of people who feel the've been betrayed by
Bush in office?

There are a lot more of those people than others. Of course there
> would also have been those that voted Bush because they did not
> want/like Kerry and so you get a few more adding to the majority vote
> for the Republicans through that.


No, there's not...no matter what biased media reports you've been reading.

But I do not think that the religious faithful, and those that voted
> along the lines of Christian Moral Values re: abortion and gays are a
> minority in the US.


They are, and they are a minority here as well. Problem is, they are often
times the loudest. For every religious nut preaching at the top of his
lungs, there are 10 reasonable people weighing the pro's and con's of a
given candidate.

On 5/31/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But it does take more than those people to get elected. The blind faith
> > idiots you mention don't account for more than maybe 20%.
> >
> > Yer never going to convince the blind idiots to vote for a
> > democrat....you've got to convince the independents. We're the ones who
> > swing the vote. That's why I see a democrat winning next time around,
> even
> > if they continue to be disorganized and bumbling.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:207853
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to