Not necessarily. Immediately after the disaster, Bush put on a strong front, and his popularity was through the roof. Yes, a good deal of that can be attributed to the "rally together" spirit that follows a disaster. But months later, his numbers remained high as the campaign in Afghanistan progressed successfully.
It wasn't until he became obsessed with Iraq that his numbers began to turn south. On 6/7/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > His behaviour after the London bombs was an improvement on Bush's > post-9/11 behaviour at least. > > > >I would disagree, in that he has a bit of style and dash that I feel > >Bush lacks. > > > >I remember one set of exchanges in the Parliament with an opponent > >that impressed me a lot. > > > >And he seldom looks like a deer caught in the headlights when asked a > question. > > > >(Not that I could do any better than Bush, but I never ran for anything) > > > >On 6/7/06, James Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:208355 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
