His soldiers didn't do it, an allied army did. That's the issue here. At 10:48 AM 1/30/02, you wrote: >> Sharon was said to be indirectly involved because his troops, >> who were holding the villages did not stop it. >> If you go out and slaughter people is your boss liable? > >I am NOT knowledgeable about this event, but, in general, when it comes >to the military, don't the superiors bare responsibility for their >soldiers? Yes, if I kill someone my boss should not be held liable - but >I'm a civilian. > >-rc > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
