I'd say there is some level of vindication, what is the old saying about indicting a ham sandwich?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:51 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: speaking of Rove > > I know but I'd assume (ack - I hate assuming <g>) that Sam wanted to > indicate that Rove was vindicated and ergo not guilty. I'm just saying > that no indictment means that there was not enough evidence to proceed. > Rove could still be as guilty as sin or as pure as the driven snow > (cough). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209086 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
