There seems to be a bit of credible evidence against Delay. Fitzpatrick did not indicate any type of concrete evidence against Rove. So, I guess I feel that Delay is likely guilty but the jury is still out as it were on Rove. Personally, even if Rove was not implicated in the Plame affair he's a dirty bastard that always at least skirts the law and definitely has no morals (refer to his treatment of McCain in 2000).
--- On Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:54 PM, G Money scribed: --- > > Yes, I know. But the question is: Was Delay's indictment enough to > convince you, personally, that he was probably guilty? And if so, is > Rove's NON-indictment, enough to convince you that he is probably NOT > guilty? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209087 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
