Read it again http://www.hillnews.com/morris/110404.aspx .... This is, dear Watson, elementary.
Next to the forged documents that sent CBS on a jihad against Bush's National Guard service and the planned "60 Minutes" ambush over the so-called missing explosives two days before the polls opened, the possibility of biased exit polling, deliberately manipulated to try to chill the Bush turnout, must be seriously considered. At the very least, the exit pollsters should have to explain, in public, how they were so wrong. Since their polls, if biased or cooked, represented an attempt to use the public airwaves to reduce voter turnout, they should have to explain their errors in a very public and perhaps official forum. This was no mere mistake. Exit polls cannot be as wrong across the board as they were on election night. I suspect foul play. On 6/14/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > exactly how would this influence the election? By the way, your links don't > seem to support your contention. > > > I think the exit polls were biased to try to influence the election. > > But that's because I'm a right wing nut :) > > > > http://www.hillnews.com/morris/110404.aspx > > > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A22188-2005Jan19.html > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election,_2004, > > _exit_polls > > > > > > On 6/14/06, Howie Hamlin wrote: > > > You don't find it troubling that the exit polls were so far off from > > the official results? I do. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209303 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
