oh! I missed the accusation, buried as it is under the assertion that CBS news has a jihad ;) What about the other two though? I gave them more time as they are more serious sources. They said there were hijinks, but I didn't see anything about it being against Bush.
>Read it again >http://www.hillnews.com/morris/110404.aspx >... >This is, dear Watson, elementary. > >Next to the forged documents that sent CBS on a jihad against Bush's >National Guard service and the planned "60 Minutes" ambush over the >so-called missing explosives two days before the polls opened, the >possibility of biased exit polling, deliberately manipulated to try to >chill the Bush turnout, must be seriously considered. > >At the very least, the exit pollsters should have to explain, in >public, how they were so wrong. Since their polls, if biased or >cooked, represented an attempt to use the public airwaves to reduce >voter turnout, they should have to explain their errors in a very >public and perhaps official forum. > >This was no mere mistake. Exit polls cannot be as wrong across the >board as they were on election night. I suspect foul play. > > >On 6/14/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209309 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
