OK, so a bunch of unsubstantiated incomplete theories from a biased party is clearly a better source.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 3:38 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Kennedy debunked > > um, a link from the local Republican paper... possibly worth reading if I > could get past page 1 of the article, which essentially says don't worry > be happy... > > ::shrug:: > > I don't worry, I am happy, and I am not convinced. > > > Rest assured, we checked out Election 2004 thoroughly > > http://www.cleveland.com/search/index. > > ssf?/base/opinion/1150619659219900. > xml?ocdia&coll=2 > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209737 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
