um... if anything is incomplete it's this article <g> The page I can see doesn't even tell me why I am supposed to believe it's all ok, really it is. I suspect bias but there isn't any there there for me to be sure.
>OK, so a bunch of unsubstantiated incomplete theories from a biased party is >clearly a better source. > >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209739 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
