Uh, no, There is specific wording in the Security Council resolutions regarding violations of the sanctions and how those can be addressed.
It states that any member nation may act independently of the security council and any other member nation. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 9:09 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Tim, what's your thoughts on this? > > the trouble with this logic is that if you extrapolate it a bit, you could > invade any country for any past wrong. I mean -- let's invade Germany for > being mean to France, why don't we. > > >I thought there were 15+ documented violations of the cease fire > agreement > >since 1991? I mean independently verified, by the UN, violations that had > >nothing to do with WMD's. This is what I'd always heard and read. Didn't > >Iraq kick the inspectors out entirely 5 or so years back? That's an > obvious > >violation. > > > >Let's be clear: I'm not justifying our invasion. But from everything I've > >seen, it WAS legally justified by the terms of the previous cease fire. > > > >On 6/23/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:210192 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
