> RoMunn wrote:
> Rove confirmed what Novak already knew in an effort to highlight the ethical
> breach by Wilson in his claims to be a disinterested "outsider", which he
> clearly was not.

While I disagree with every one of your conclusions the most
interesting claim is the "disinterested outsider" ethics violation.

It's not and ethics violation to recommend the most qualified person
you know for a job even if that person happens to be related to you.
In fact I'd say you're being injurious to the company if you don't
recommend a family member or friend if you believe them to be the best
person for the job.

The ethics violation is if you do the hiring without review.  That
wasn't the case here.  Why does the fact that his wife is in the CIA
compromise his ability to make a commerce evaluation?  How is his hire
a breech of ethics?

In fact, if it weren't for the recommendation of his family, we all
know that Bush would be a used car salesman in Plano.  So here's where
we are on the logic tree:

There was no ethics violation here, but I'd be happy to agree with you
if you agree that the entire Bush Presidency is, therefore, an ethics
violation.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:210995
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to