yes Sam, it's a ban on funding research on new lines of stem cells. On 7/20/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/20/06, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > You're right, were at least a decade away. How far away would we be > > now if the ban wouldn't have been enacted in 2001? > > It's not a ban. > The president decided to spend $250 million plus on umbilical cord > cell research and adult stem cell research which has already produced > results. He only spent $25 million plus last year on embryonic stem > cells, which have produced no results so far. I think he should cut > some pork and spend more money on embryonic research also but at least > he's still funding it. And as I mentioned California is kicking in $3 > billion. Aren't they broke? > > > BTW, this woman realized it too, she was upset that more children > > would have to die like hers. > > My point is we might not find that cure here. So they might HAVE to die > anyway. > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211564 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
