Clearly, you either didn't read and/or understand what I wrote. When referring to meaningless blather, please point at yourself. I explicitly said that I neither condemn nor condone the veto. I was asked that question point blank, answering it with the same, thereby rendering your question and implied judgement meaningless. I was presenting an alternative opinion.
My willingness to do whatever is irrelevant. Even if I supported the veto, my involvement in raising embryos is nil, principally because they aren't my children. Furthermore, it was repeatedly said that the veto would not stop the research. Why is it that government research is the most important thing here? Can't the private sector take care of this? - Matt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 6:16 PM Subject: Re: Welp, it's official > >You should read the thread from the beginning. >> >>- Matt >> > > I did my point remains. If you are so willing to impose your morality > involving frozen embryos on others, then one of the consequences is that > you need to put your money where your mouth/morality is. Are you willing > to subject your wife to multiple invasive surgical procedures, and > possibly spend hundreds of thousands to support very deformed (from the > damage caused by the freezing) children? > > You can talk all you want, but unless you are willing to take up the > consequences of your beliefs its only meaningly blather. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211585 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
