> That's just being bigoted. The press has not reported any of the > details because they were not released by the British government until > Friday. Then it became clear who they were. Bigoted? How am I being a bigot? Who am I being a bigot against? If I accused the Amish out of hand (the only group I mentioned other than Jews), then I heartilly appologize to them. If I'm bigoted against Al Queda because they were mentioned in the article, then reporting what was said must now be bigotry. And everyone including France knew who was responsable and where they were from well before Friday.
> Your poor victimization rants are getting tiresome. You want to try > something else? http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/45884734/reports/The_Photo_that_Started_it_All.asp That's my poor victimization rant. The press is always willing to speak first and tell the truth later. Want more? How about that 3 year old girl that was killed falling off a swing and the press automatically put in the headlines that it was Israel's fault and only after the damage was done did they retract it. Reuters accused Israel of firing on a funeral in Lebanon and just retracted that as well. If it's Israel, there is proof time and again of the media's jumping all over it. If it's any other country or group, the reports or speculation is held back. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213071 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
