I'm very curious about this statement. Do you really believe that the media has an agenda of bias against Israel to the extent that they deliberately publish stories that make Israel look bad? Or simply that they are quicker to assume that Israel is in the wrong while giving all other countries the benefit of the doubt? The reason I ask is because on most other lists I'm on, the media is being accused of having a pro-Israeli bias, and I'm trying to reconcile the opposing views with what I see in the media. As you know, I have a family member who makes some of the decisions for a very large news organization on what gets shown, and I have a hard time conceiving of her saying "oh, this makes Israel look bad, lets run it without checking it first". And that seems to be what you are saying they do.
On 8/12/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it's Israel, there is proof time and again of the media's jumping all over > it. If it's any other country or group, the reports or speculation is held > back. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213076 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
