I dunno if I care about this enough to research it. But my point is
not necessarity that I agree with this video, just that I don't think
it's ridiculous on the face of it.

On 8/23/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a difference in being hit on accident, and trying to avoid it and
> somebody that is attempting to hit it with enough force to do major damage.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 5:25 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Loose Change
> >
> > ok well... what this movie says is that the building was in fact
> > designed to withstand being hit by a plane, and that jet fuel does not
> > burn hot enough to achieve those results. See the movie for more
> > detail. I am not going to argue its merits either pro or con.
> >
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:214059
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to