It's only a double standard to the people who let Moore get away with his bullshit. I never did. Both are demonstrably fictitious in parts, or twist contexts to convey a message totally different than the original event.
You have to cry foul on both counts. On 9/11/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So this is the Right's version of Fahrenheit. Moore was able to pass his > film off as a "documentary", but this group had to back off and say it was > a > work of fiction. I seem to remember that people who are up in arms now > about > this film had no problem with Fahrenheit. In fact, lots of them went to > see > it. Isn't that a double-standard? > > On 9/11/06, G Money wrote: > > > > Agreed. This is the right's version of Fahrenheit....and they are trying > > to > > pass it off as fact (just like Fatass Moore did), but they've duped a > > network into being their vehicle for it. > > > > Sad that on the 5 year anniversary, instead of talking about how far > we've > > come, we're discussing how far we've drifted..... > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:215150 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
