Plural marriages? Since they would have no legal standing, just spiritual and social standing, they would no longer be forbidden, would they?
Gay marriages? Again, since they convey no rights in this life, nothing to prevent the Unitarian church to continue to marry people, regardless of what the civil side ends up doing. At one point, churches allowed mixed-race marriages, even when the local government didn't. On 9/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What union would the church recognize that the gov't would? > > Man and dog, dog and cat, Gruss and Sam? :) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:216005 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
