On 9/26/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This lie is same way that 90% of Americans thought that Iraq was > directly tied to 9/11. > > How did Americans get that idea when Bush himself has just admitted > that Iraq was in no way tied to 9/11? > > Because of his implicit lie. > > I guess I find it almost disingenuous that anyone would say that > calling Iraq "central to the war on terror" doesn't clearly and > directly MEAN that our presence in Iraq in necessary to defeat > terrorism.
Well no wait a minute, you are changing your position. You said Bush lied because he called Iraq "center to the war on terrorism" even though our presence there was increasing the number of terrorists. NOW you are saying that it's a lie because you don't believe our presence there is necessary to defeat terrorism, which is unrelated to whether it's currently increasing or abating the number of terrorists. You completely disagree with Bush's statement that Iraq is central to the war on terror, and that's cool, I pretty much agree with that.....but I don't think you can classify his statement as a blatant lie because we seem to be losing. When it comes down to it, actually, his statement is one of opinion...which can't really be a lie unless we can see inside his thoughts. -- "We can sit outside and argue all night long, about a God we've never seen, but who never fails to side with me." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:216055 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
