> RoMunn wrote: > Of course the war is a huge recruiting tool for terrorists. But if it wasn't > Iraq, it would be Afghanistan or Lebanon or the Israeli-Palestinian > conflict. What is the alternative?
The most disturbing part is this: it's proof positive of the administration boldly lying to the American people to cover up a failed policy. Here's why: During the very time this administration's own intelligence staff was telling them that Iraq was INCREASING terrorism, it was condemning John Kerry's resolution claiming that Iraq was "the center" of fighting terrorism. Let's repeat that for effect: this administration was telling the American people that Iraq was "central to the war on terror" despite the fact that their own intelligence people were disputing that. BTW - The answer to your very rhetorical point is: no it wouldn't. The Afghanistan invasion was World supported and it's gov't was harboring and allied with Bin Laden - the leader of the team that attacked America on 9/11. Put another way, the invasion of Afghanistan was legitimate while the invasion of Iraq was not. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:216027 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
