> Sam wrote: > http://powerlineblog.com/archives/015364.php >
The point is that it's not just Rummy but all of the Republican Senators that opposed Clinton during the time, many of whom are in power today. Further the whole basis of this is Republicans trying to head off the valid argument that Bush did jack to fend off Al Quaeda prior to 9/11 (not Clinton or his legacy). For example, when Pres Clinton was delivered a report stating that Bin Laden might use Airplanes to attack the US he tightened airport and airline security (much to the very public disturbance of airlines as they had to pay for it.) Bush, on the other hand, was delivered a document titled, "Bin Laden Determined To Attack Inside the United States" and did nothing. Further, Bush demoted and cast aside Mr. Clark, a terrorism expert who had served for both Pres Reagan and Pres Bush, who was attempting to push forward the Al Quaeda danger. Of course arguing who sucked more is mostly pointless. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:216124 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
