Actually, from what I've seen of this thread, you have *no* facts at all concerning Christian involvement. Not that you're wrong, but merely that you haven't shown any evidence of the facts that you mention. That was Hatton's point. This sort of thing is called slander. Wow you missed the point totally. You were so concerned with talking that you didn't listen.
- Matt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Skorp Croze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 1:09 PM Subject: Re: Fear of religious fanatics > Why, then, do you think the teacher was fired? Do you have ANY other > possibility? I'd love to hear one that has any shred of information > behind it. > > Do you truly think that the firing was for another reason, or are you > just claiming "You don't have enough facts to make this call?" to > stall and obfuscate the issue? > > I certainly have enough facts to make this call. But I might be wrong, > and that's OK. I am not the law, the government, or a district > attorney. My judgement on the matter is personal opinion, which I am > free to have. I also happen to think I am right. > > If it turns out I was wrong, and the teacher was fired > (coincidentally, just after the museum visit and the parent(s) > complained) due to poor performance (after years of exemplary work), > or for too many parking tickets, or if it was the teacher's private > parts shown to the student, then I will admit I blew it, laugh at > myself and my biases. But we both know that is not going to happen, > don't we? ;) > > > On 9/27/06, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That's the entire problem with the stance that you are taking: you are >> assuming that because the actions happened where they did that they >> were taken by Christians. My entire position is based on the fact >> that you don't know enough about the actual issue to state undeniably >> that it's based on religous convictions. >> >> And yes, I know that other people that have called into a talk radio >> show will say that they'd be upset because of religous beliefs. The >> School Board declined to comment, nothing has been heard from the >> Principal or the Teacher. There are no absolute statements of fact >> that it's a religous issue. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:216247 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
