It's interesting that this article points out how alot of the tax
increases are from Corporations and the top 1% or earners.

-Cameron

On 10/7/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Prince Valliant wrote:
> >    I was sad to see taxes being one of the big reasons the people who did
> > vote for bush did so.  And how happy they were as he was basically tanking
> > our economy and the bit of savings we had managed to magically
>
> Well ... things aren't so bad.  But DESPITE Bush and his sycophants
> not because of them:
>
> ----------------------------
> Tax Tidal Wave
> October 6, 2006; Page A14
>
> Congress keeps breaking the Beltway Book of World Records for spending
> money, but the government will soon report that the federal budget
> deficit for the just-completed 2006 fiscal year fell to about $260
> billion.
>
> What's the secret of this deficit success that you aren't reading much
> about this election year? It isn't spending restraint. The federal
> budget expanded to $2.7 trillion last year, a 9% increase, or three
> times the inflation rate. Over the past six years the federal budget
> has increased by 49.2%.
> [Tax and Spend Cycle]
>
> The main cause of the deficit decline -- 90% of it, says White House
> budget director Rob Portman -- is a tidal wave of tax revenue. Tax
> collections have increased by $521 billion in the last two fiscal
> years, the largest two-year revenue increase -- even after adjusting
> for inflation -- in American history. If you're surprised to hear
> that, it's probably because inside Washington this is treated as the
> only secret no one wants to print. On the few occasions when the media
> pay attention to the rise in tax collections, they scratch their heads
> and wonder where this "surprising" and "unexpected windfall" came
> from.
>
> One place it has come from are corporations, whose tax collections
> have climbed by 76% over the past two years thanks to greater
> profitability. Personal income tax payments are up by 30.3% since 2004
> too, despite the fact that the highest tax rate is down to 35% from
> 39.6%. The IRS tax-return data just released last month indicates that
> a near-record 37% of those income tax payments are received from the
> top 1% of earners -- "the rich," who are derided regularly in
> Washington for not paying their "fair share."
>
> More good news is that dividend-tax payments appear to be up as well,
> even though the tax rate was lowered to 15% from as high as 39.6%. A
> National Bureau of Economic Research study found that "after a
> continuous decline in dividend payments over more than two decades,
> total regular dividends have grown by nearly 20%" and that this
> reversal happened at "precisely the point at which the lower tax rate
> was proposed and subsequently applied retroactively." There hasn't
> been a purer validation of the Laffer Curve since Ronald Reagan rode
> off into the sunset.
>
> As for the budget deficit, at $260 billion it is now about 2% of our
> $13 trillion economy, well below the 2.7% average of the last 40
> years. Most states and localities are also afloat in tax collections,
> and including their revenue surpluses brings the total U.S. public
> sector borrowing down to roughly 1.5% of GDP. Not too shabby given
> that we're waging a war on terrorism and Congress spent $50 billion
> last year on Hurricane Katrina clean-up.
>
> Anyway, we thought our taxpaying readers might like to know how much
> you've all been contributing to the falling deficit -- the best-kept
> secret in Washington.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:217080
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to