must I preface it with <sarcasm></sarcasm> tags? it was only partly sarcasm. The point about the nature of the debate was serious though.
> That's the funniest thing you've said in a long time. Do you see the > irony in that statement :) > > On 10/8/06, Larry Lyons wrote: > > No there are mainly those ancephalics who think that the best way to > handle any criticism of the great leader (ie GW Bush) is to personally > insult and attach those who disagree with them. Since that sort of > crap started the level of debate went from actual reasoned debate to > something that 5 year olds in a playground would be embarassed about. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:217095 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
