i can't imagine that the election had nothing to do with it. On the
other hand, if he were operating for the good of the party, he should
have done it weeks ago. For the good of the country, months ago. I
think he probably fell on his sword to make it look like Bush is
responsive

On 11/8/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I think he should have fired him months, maybe years ago, I find it
> hard to believe that he fired him at all. Knowing the way these cronies
> operate, I imagine it was one of those "mutual decisions".
>
> On 11/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The Post is saying that Bush fired him..
> >
> > Post article
> >
> > Scott A. Stewart
> > REAC/PASS-IT
> > (202)-475-8875
> >
> >
>
> --
> Anarchist reactionary running dog revisionist
> Hindu muslim catholic creation / evolutionist
> Rational romantic mystic cynical idealist
> Minimal expressionist post-modern neo-symbolist
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:220154
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to