> Dana wrote: > Your guy here seems to be saying that we got rid of Rumsfeld in order > to see him replaced with something worse.
Which is conspiracy BS, but we'll see if I'm wrong. Bush's Dad finally convinced his son that he was an idiot and the son finally agreed. So now Bush is trying it Daddy's way. There's no way Bush would appoint a "Sec of Iraq" if he didn't intend on implementing the solution the nominee helped create. And much of that solution has already been released. The piece tries to make some crazy realist point without remembering that the whole reason we're the position we are is because we invaded Iraq when it was massively stupid to do so. This is the same argument the neo-cons have been making for 4 years: the principled right-thing-to-do. Well, it wasn't that's now obvious. So the editorial is pig with lipstick and 70% of America is Jewish. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:220573 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
