we'll see. I think there are questions. The confirmation hearings should be interesting ;)
On 11/13/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dana wrote: > > Your guy here seems to be saying that we got rid of Rumsfeld in order > > to see him replaced with something worse. > > Which is conspiracy BS, but we'll see if I'm wrong. Bush's Dad > finally convinced his son that he was an idiot and the son finally > agreed. So now Bush is trying it Daddy's way. > > There's no way Bush would appoint a "Sec of Iraq" if he didn't intend > on implementing the solution the nominee helped create. And much of > that solution has already been released. > > The piece tries to make some crazy realist point without remembering > that the whole reason we're the position we are is because we invaded > Iraq when it was massively stupid to do so. > > This is the same argument the neo-cons have been making for 4 years: > the principled right-thing-to-do. Well, it wasn't that's now obvious. > > So the editorial is pig with lipstick and 70% of America is Jewish. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:220575 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
