> GG wrote:
> Therefore, current public opinion is simply reflecting his record, not
> predicting it's future outcome.
>
I would also add that Iraq is no longer a military policy question,
it's a common sense question: do you send more Americans into a
foreign civil war or not?
We only have 3 reasons to die for Iraq's civil war:
1.) We need to protect America's energy supply.
2.) We need to prevent Iraq from becoming a base for international terrorism.
3.) Some asshat dumped our relatives into the middle of a firestorm
and now we need to put out the fire.
If we pull out now likely Iraq implodes, if we stay we delay the
implosion until we leave. So there's only 2 choices:
1.) Send in 1,000,000 troops to lock the country down, or
2.) Slowly pull out ("redeploy to the sea" as Reagan said) and hope
for the best.
Bush's "plan" will probably (<- key word) change nothing, so why do
it? Too few troops for hawks (me) and too many for doves.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:224282
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
