>On 1/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>So what's that three and a half weeks against the US? We don't invade,
>just a few strategic attacks. They can't invade the US. Maybe they
>could attack us in Iraq, but we would still win. We would probably
>just shock and awe them until they stopped.
>If they did have a working nuke, where would they send it? Iraq or
>Israel? We have hundreds to launch at them before their one exploded.
>The only thing they have is terrorism and a leader that few support.
>Let's humiliated him.

And they are not going to respond to "just a few strategic attacks"? Lets have 
a reality check here. Pearl Harbor was just a strategic attack, and look what 
happened after that.

Not that I'm equating this country with Fascist Japan, but the analogy is the 
same. If the US attacks Iran, then there will be a response from Iran. I would 
guess a massive asymmetric style of attacks (think hundreds of terrorist type 
attacks on US forces in Afghanistan, Iraq and Saudi Arabia for starters).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:224797
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to