More comments... some of the amendments not being incorporated into this
bill:

These are amendments WERE NOT incorporated, they were voted against.
- An immediate ban on all soft money effective on the passing of the bill.
- Ban soft money to state and local elections.
- No portion of the bill can violate First Amendment rights.

Hatton


> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. Hatton Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:27 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: yay!
>
>
> > -- It prohibits labor unions and corporations from using "soft money" to
> > fund advertising that mentions a federal candidate within 60 days of a
> > general election and 30 days of a primary. While these organizations can
> > finance some ads through political action committees, they must
> > disclose the names of their donors.
>
> Two notes of clarification (listening to Rush on this topic)
>
> The bill includes provisions stating that no advertising campaign of any
> kind may be run to criticize an opponent or an incumbent, which means that
> if you think your opponent screwed up the you can't say anything about it
> within the 60 and 30 day limits.
>
> Also, most people don't start "researching" who they want to vote
> for until
> the last 2 weeks or so before an election... either that or
> they've already
> made up their minds.
>
> So, I still stick with my logical conclusion that the bill is
> abridging the
> freedom of speech.  Ethical actions of the recipients aside,
> there's serious
> problems with this picture.
>
> Hatton
> 
______________________________________________________________________
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to