Whose original leak resulted in public disclosure of her identity? Libby told Miller in June, according to her notes, but she never published anything. Armitage told Bob Woodward in June, though Woodward didn't write about it, either. Armitage told Bob Novak in July. Novak published the first story about the whole affair in July. Under these circumstances, how exactly is Scooter Libby corrupting the cause of justice? No underlying crime was even committed. Not liking Libby is one thing, but putting him in prison is quite another.
On 1/30/07, Gruss wrote: > > > RoMunn wrote: > > That's the point, he wasn't lying to protect somebody.He wasn't lying to > > protect Rove, as seems to be the implication in all of this bluster, > because > > Rove was not the original source of the leak. > > > > Well it would seem that Scooter is still lying according to Judy > Miller: her testimony basically says that he knew about Plame before > he says he did. If that turns out to be the case then he will > rightfully be convicted and he can forget about a pardon; he's now > enemy #1 with the Whitehouse. > > As for the whole Plame affair as a whole, the most interesting > lingering question is why Cheney commissioned a research trip, but > never got any report back. > -- --------------- Robert Munn www.funkymojo.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:226260 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
