On 2/2/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > oooo... links... > > > http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/01/resisting_global_warming_panic.html > > oh and look, as one would expect from a right-wing site, the hockey > stick "myth" is exploded!
Shoot the messenger if you don't like the message. > So much fun!! > > Oh, here's one... http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=11 ...Where > the actual science is not only explained, but is backed up with *GASP* > actual science! (now, admittedly the post is from 2004... but > refutation is refutation) > > I particularly like this gem: > "The claims of McIntyre and McKitrick [Hockey stick 'deniers' - will] > have now been further discredited in the peer-reviewed scientific > literature, in a paper to appear in the American Meteorological > Society journal, "Journal of Climate" by Rutherford and colleagues > (2004) [and by yet another paper by an independent set of authors that > is currently "under review" and thus cannot yet be cited--more on this > soon!]. Rutherford et al (2004) demonstrate nearly identical results > to those of MBH98, using the same proxy dataset as Mann et al (1998) > but addressing the issues of infilled/missing data raised by Mcintyre > and McKitrick, and using an alternative climate field reconstruction > (CFR) methodology that does not represent any proxy data networks by > PCA at all." > > Notice the "Peer review" part, very important in Science. http://www.realclimate.org was created by Mann to defend his hockey stick BS. Much more fun: http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=11676 The Research Council committee found the Mann team's conclusion that warming in the last few decades of the 20th century was unprecedented over the last thousand years to be plausible, but it had less confidence that the warming was unprecedented prior to 1600; fewer proxies -- in fewer locations -- provide temperatures for periods before then. Because of larger uncertainties in temperature reconstructions for decades and individual years, and because not all proxies record temperatures for such short timescales, even less confidence can be placed in the Mann team's conclusions about the 1990s, and 1998 in particular. > > http://www.nysun.com/article/47920 > > Nice op.ed. *giggle*... *smirk*... dammit! :-D oh, whew, almost got > that out without snickering... > > Here you go Sam! > > http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/02/the-ipcc-fourth-assessment-summary-for-policy-makers/#more-394 I see you pick and choose your scientists. > again, real science, real scientists, not op.ed. > > let's see which stands up better to peer review. More fun reading The religion of Global Warming: http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/02/a_necessary_apocalypse.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:226629 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
