So we use ethanol because it burns cleaner but uses up more energy, and now Mexico doesn't have enough corn to make tortillas. Did we solve a problem or create more. We can lower emmisions but if we play the game that the world ends in ten years we might pick the wrong solution.
Do we even use Irans oil? Didn't we sanction them? On 2/2/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But, in the end, who cares who's to blame? It's happening and it's > going to have drastic consequences so we'd all be smart to act now and > act big; we may not get a second chance. > > The concept is related to, and comparable to, a push for alternative > forms of energy - that is, not oil/petrol, but something else. > > It's a huge problem that, at this moment, is a clear and present > danger to the security of the United States. Iran essentially has an > "oil weapon" that it can use to threaten the US and we can't do a > thing about it. > > Whether it's our fault (Clinton's, Bush's, Carter's, Reagan's) or > Iran's is irrelevant. We need to do something now and that should be > to immediately and heavily invest US tax dollars in discovering, > developing, and implementing a new form of energy. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:226631 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
