Sam, I hate to tell you this, but...you aren't debunking a thing. It's a fact that committees are of[ten wrong, but the error they are prone to is inertia and over-conservatism. So when a committee of scientists makes a categorical statement, I'm inclined to think there 's some evidence.
That negotiation was required tells me that half of them wanted "likely"and the others wanted "certain." On 2/2/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/2/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > with unproven opinions, neat. > > If I can debunk an unproven opinion with another unproven opinion than > I've made my point. > > > heh, you're on the religious side of this argument. you've got no > > science on your side. > > No, I'm asking for scientific proof and you're giving me group think. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:226702 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
