hehehehehe You playing with that fuzzy math? This nice images CLEARLY shows it's gone up, down, up, down, up http://www.eea.europa.eu/pressroom/newsreleases/Images/ghg2006_1.jpg
Kyoto was signed in 1998 and implemented in 2002. >From 2002 2005 it goes up. Are you trying to say Kyoto has done more harm than good? I'm not, just that it might not be the solution. On 2/2/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sam wrote: > > I think it says it went up .3% but transportation went up .6% from the > > year before. If you look at the graph, you'll see it's starting to > > looks like a hockey stick :) > > > > The data clearly shows that, overall, the rate of increase of GHG has > slowed decade over decade. In other words, Kyoto (or something else) > is working. > > If you don't understand that you need to take some math and statistics > classes. Understand distributions, controls, averages, and > statistical variation. > > Once you do you'll see your error. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:226708 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
