On 2/2/07, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You see to be arguing this. I don't see you making points about taking a > measured and cautious approach to reducing human's contribution to CO2. All > I see is attempts to refute that it is even happening.
Just the other day I mentioned Los Angelos lowering it's ozone warnings from 100 to 0 in just a few years. All new factories need to have lower emmisions. I also said I'd be happy applying the CAFE laws to SUVS. Station wagons get taxed but SUV's are trucks? If they're trucks they shouldn't be allowed on the parkways :) So what does Kyoto give you, the ability to sell polution rights? Rather then saving for a new plant the small factories have to pay the newer ones to stay open. I don't see that helping. > I interpret that as; if it is not happening then we do not need to do > anything about it. Wrong interpretation. > So answer some simple hopefully straight forward questions about your stance. > > Do you believe global warming is happening at this time? Yes. > If so, do you feel human actions has any effect on this? Not sure, it's possible. > If we do, how much? I'm not qualified to answer that other than a wild guess. > And what should actions, if any, should be taken at this time? We should do everything we can within reason to reduce pollution and our carbon footprint. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:226700 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
