On 2/6/07, Mary Jo Sminkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And I still say it's a dumb statement. There's no evidence that something > like a large atomic explosion for instance would not effect climate??
That might temporarily alter it but not "change the climate." > It's near impossible to reach that level of "proof" about a system over which > we cannot remove all other effects, so to demand it is simply unreasonable. And yet a bunch of political delegates just wrote a summary claiming that scientists are 90% sure. > and the vast majority of scientists do feel that it supports the theory that > we are a major contributing factor. I don't trust hunches. We'll see what the full report says and what proof they have to claim 90%. Don't forget the ones that speak out are personally attacked and/or will never get funding. That's a scary way to do science. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:227083 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
