On 2/9/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is this link supposed to prove the legality of signing statements > according to you? Did you read it?
Let me explain how the laws of our country work. Starts with the constitution. It gives the president final say over a bill. If someone were to say that's not the case they would bring it up in a court of law and it would be determined constitutional or not. IF nobody challenges it's legality it's legal. See if it wasn't legal it would be challenged and decided it's not legal. Got it? > ``This shows that the Supreme Court is alert to this dispute -- that > the Supreme Court reads the newspapers," Fein said." And has not deemed it unconstitutional. > Incidentally a reference in a dissenting opinion, even at the supreme > court level, does not constitute case law. But seriously dude.... I am > previewing some distance education software for the reading lab... > want me to see if I can get you an account? First you said it wasn't legal and I proved it was. Then you wanted a supporting point of view and I provided them. Then you wanted someone not part of this administration to support it and I gave you two Supreme Court judges. Now you want case law even though the standing law was never ever challenged in over 200 years. How can there be case law on an issue that was never presented to the courts? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:227677 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
