I never implied that it was 'just about oil', but this would have played a factor, and is something to consider seriously as the "War On Terror" ..like the "War On Drugs" ..continues.
You are deliberately misunderstanding and misconstruing what I said. Which is why it is pointless to attempt to discuss this with you. -Gel -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Umm ... because there's a real threat? The idea that this is all about oil is a notion that is just beyond comprehension. Do you really believe that the US has gotten sympathy because of oil? "Oh, poor US, their oil supply is in danger. We better let them go bomb Afghanistan." H. -----Original Message----- From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] How would the United States have gotten worldwide sympathy and support for a move like that otherwise? How would they get worldwide support to oust Saddam Hussein so long after Desert Storm unless under the asupices of the "War On Terror"? How could Ashcroft, Lieberman and their cronies say that "Americans must finally realise that their freedoms need to be restricted after the events of September 11th..." with impunity and finally pass laws that were struck down repeatedly when they came up for review in the past if not under the umbrella of new "Homeland Security"? -Gel ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
