On 3/7/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just putting the severity if the lie in perspective to the case. > > so, a little lie is okay, and a big lie is bad.
The question is did the lie have anything to do with the case? > Or perhaps a little lie is not okay "I did not have sexual relations > with that woman, Miss Lewinsky." Shows a pattern of behavior, has a direct impact on the Paula Jones case. > And a big lie is okay "Iraq *has* Weapons of Mass Destruction." Let's leave Clinton out of this. > I guess it depends upon your POV. > > Of course, in the eyes of the law, lying to the Feds is supposed to be > verboten. So why did Russert and Miller do it? Why did all the prosecution witness do it > Unless, of course, it's your guy. Then it's okay, as long as the lie > is small. I think. Is that right? Did he out Plame? If not then it's irrelevant to the case. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2. Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/ Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:229663 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
