On 3/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How did Fitzgerald know it was Armitage? Did his knowledge of Armitage's > involvement provide enough evidence for a conviction?
Armitage called Fitzgerald and confessed long before Libby was called to the grand jury. Case over. > Oh wait I think > that is what grand juries do. They take a questionable situation call > people in who may have information and ask them questions. Oh yeah > that's right, that's when Libby lied. The offense that he was convicted of. Fitzgerald, who set it upon himself to find any process violation he could find, and who tricked an unsuspecting Libby, who knew he'd not leaked Plame's name to anyone into repeated FBI and grand jury interrogations in the hope of finding any memory inconsistency, no matter how immaterial or insignificant on which to hang his hat? - Clarice Feldman > So Cheney wasn't charged, Rove wasn't charged actually no one has been > charged with the leak. but because Libby (and potentially others) lied > to the grand jury it is a political witch hunt. Had he told the truth > one of two things would have happened. A) If there was a planned leak he > would have indicted someone (potentially Cheney or Rove) or B) if there > was no planned leak then nothing would have happened. So why lie to the > grand jury? What was the lie? Russert told him first, Cheney told him a month earlier or he told Miller. It doesn't matter if he didn't remember the timeline of events from a year earlier ARMITAGE WAS THE LEAKER. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/ Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:229653 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
